Interactive laboratory complex for training ground in the field of automation and process technology management

Authors and copyright holders:

• Shurygin Yu. A. , Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics (Tomsk, Russia)
• Dmitriev V. M. , Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics (Tomsk, Russia)
• Gembuh L. A. , Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics (Tomsk, Russia)
• Kochergin M. I. , Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics (Tomsk, Russia)

• 1. Dmitriev V.M., Gembukh L.A. [Conceptual model of a real‑virtual laboratory]. Bulletin of the South Ural State University, 2022, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 5–16 (in Russ.).
• 2. Dmitriev V.M., Gembukh L.A., Sakhabutdinov A.E. [Implementation of a digital twin in the MARS modeling environment]. Bulletin of the South Ural State University, 2023, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 26–36 (in Russ.).
• 3. Real Games. Factory I/O. Available at: https://factoryio.com/ (Accessed: 20.09.2024).
• 4. Logic Design Inc. PLCLogix 5000. Available at: https://plclogix.com/ (Accessed: 20.09.2024).
• 5. CODESYS Group. CODESYS Development System. Available at: https://www.codesys.com/ (Accessed: 20.09.2024).
• 6. Herodio R. et al. Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis. Computers & Education, 2016, vol. 98, pp. 14–38.
• 7. Lebedev K.N. [Automated stand for conducting laboratory work in electrical engineering disciplines]. Agrotekhnika i energoobespechenie, 2020, no. 4 (29), pp. 64–71 (in Russ.).
• 8. Wahyudi M.N.A., Budiyanto C.W., Widiastuti I., Hatta P., Bakar M.S. Understanding Virtual Laboratories in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2023, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 102–118.
• 9. Potkonjak V. et al. Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 2016, vol. 95, pp. 309–327.
• 10. Henke K. et al. GOLDi – Grid of Online Lab Devices Ilmenau: Demonstration of online experimentation. International Journal of Online Engineering (iJOE), 2016, vol. 12, no. 04, pp. 60–62.
• 11. Dormido S. et al. The UNILabs Project: A Network of Remote Laboratories for Education in Control Engineering. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2014, vol. 47, iss. 3, pp. 9069–9074.
• 12. Gustavsson I. et al. The VISIR open laboratory platform 10 years of remote experiments. International Journal of Online Engineering, 2014, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 16–23.
• 13. García-Zubía J. et al. The WebLab-Deusto platform: Creating new competences through remote laboratories. International Journal of Online Engineering, 2010, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–7.
• 14. Sellberg C., Nazari Z., Solberg M. Virtual Laboratories in STEM Higher Education: A Scoping Review. Nordic Journal of Systematic Reviews in Education, 2024, vol. 2, pp. 58–75.
• 15. Solis-Lastra J., Albertini B. A Light Systematic Literature Review on Remote Laboratories for Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Sciences and Humanities International Research Conference (SHIRCON 2021), Lima, Peru, 17–19 November 2021. IEEE, 2021.
• 16. Rejón C., Martin S., Robles-Gómez A. Easy Development of Industry 4.0 Remote Labs. Electronics, 2024, vol. 13, no. 8, p. 1508.
• 17. Kritzinger W. et al. Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2018, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1016–1022.
• 18. Tao F. et al. Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018, vol. 94, pp. 3563–3576.
• 19. Madni A.M., Madni C.C., Lucero S.D. Leveraging Digital Twin Technology in Model-Based Systems Engineering. Systems, 2019, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 7.
• 20. Kochergin M.I., Dmitriev V.M., Gandzha T.V. [. Educational and Illustrative Modules Based on Multilevel Computer Models]. Modern Information Technologies and IT-Education, 2023, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 739–751 (in Russ.).
• 21. Li J., Liang W. Effectiveness of Virtual Laboratory in Engineering Education: A Meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 2024, vol. 19, no. 12.
• 22. Alam K.M., El Saddik A. C2PS: A Digital Twin Architecture Reference Model for the Cloud-Based Cyber-Physical Systems. IEEE Access, 2017, vol. 5, pp. 2050–2063.
• 23. Barricelli B.R., Casiraghi E., Fogli D. A Survey on Digital Twin: Definitions, Characteristics, Applications, and Design Implications. IEEE Access, 2019, vol. 7, pp. 167653–167671.
• 24. Veza I., Sule A., Putra N.R., Idris M.N., Ghazali I., Irianto I., Pendit U.C., Mosliano G., Arasmatusy. Virtual Laboratory for Engineering Education: Review of Virtual Laboratory for Students Learning. Engineering Science Letter, 2022, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 41–46.
• 25. Palmer C. et al. Digital Twinning remote laboratories for online practical learning. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE), 2022, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 4–24.
• 26. Mokrov G.P. [Educational training ground as a tool for practical training]. Automation, Communications, Informatics, 2018, no. 3, pp. 39–42 (in Russ.).
• 27. Gandzha T.V. Formalizovannoe predstavlenie obobshchennogo tekhnicheski slozhnogo ob’ekta s komp'yuternoi model'yu v konture upravleniya [Formalized representation of a generalized technically complex object with a computer model in the control loop]. Instruments and Systems: Monitoring, Control, and Diagnostics, 2012, no. 2, pp. 29–35 (in Russ.).
• 28. Thulukkanam K. Heat Exchanger Design Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 2013.
• 29. Poo M.C.-P., Lau Y.-y., Chen Q. Are Virtual Laboratories and Remote Laboratories Enhancing the Quality of Sustainability Education. Education Sciences, 2023, vol. 13, no. 11, 1110, pp. 1–13.
• 30. Van den Beemt A., Groothuijsen S., Ozkan L., Hendrix W. Remote labs in higher engineering education: engaging students with active learning pedagogy. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2023, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 320–340.