Technologies for social media narrative analysis: review

DOI: 10.21293/1818-0442-2025-28-1-100-107

Download article in PDF format

JATS xml

Abstract: Social media play a pivotal role in modern communication. The primary element of textual content in social media is narratives, which convey sequences of events and reflect the author’s perspective. As the volume of user-generated data grows, the task of automated narrative extraction from text is becoming increasingly critical. The goal of this article is to conduct a comparative analysis of existing methods, approaches, and tools for automated narrative extraction, followed by a formalization of their structure. Such formalization is essential for algorithmizing the narrative extraction process using NLP tools (Natural Language Processing). The study explores key approaches to narrative representation, including methods based on bag-of-words, semantic annotations, ontologies, and vector representations (word embeddings). Their limitations and domains of application are analyzed. The special emphasis is placed on adapting these methods to analyze short, fragmented texts typical to social media (e.g., posts, tweets). The findings of this research useful for the development of narrative analysis algorithms, offering new opportunities for applications in marketing research, public opinion analysis, and psycholinguistics.

Keywords: narrative, narrative modeling, computational narratology, computational linguistics, natural language processing, social media analysis, review

For citation:
Rybachenko I. A. Technologies for social media narrative analysis: review. Doklady Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta sistem upravleniya i radioelektroniki, 2025, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 100–106. DOI: 10.21293/1818-0442-2025-28-1-100-107

Authors and copyright holders:

  • 1. Moshtyljova E.S. Modeli narracii v sovremennoj russkojazynoj internet-kommunikacii: lingvo-pragmaticheskij i lingvo-stilisticheskij analiz. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [The narrative model in modern Russian-language Internet communication: linguistic-pragmatic and linguistic-stylistic analysis. Dissertation for Candidate of Sciences degree in Philology]. Nizhny Novgorod, 2021, 22 p. (in Russ.).
  • 2. Sevilla-Liu A. The theoretical basis of a functional-descriptive approach to qualitative research in CBS: With a focus on narrative analysis and practice. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2023, vol. 30, pp. 210–216. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.11.001.
  • 3. Hermwille L., Schulze-Steinen M., Brandemann V., Roelfes M., Vrontisi Z., Kesküla E., Anger-Kraavi A., Trembaczowski Ł., Mandrysz W., Muster R., Zygmunt-Ziemianek A. Of hopeful narratives and historical injustices – An analysis of just transition narratives in European coal regions. Energy Research & Social Science, 2023, vol. 104, p. 103263. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103263.
  • 4. Jia Z., Pramanik S., Saha R.R., Weikum G. Complex Temporal Question Answering on Knowledge Graphs. Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 2021. DOI: 10.1145/3459637.3482416.
  • 5. Kroll H., Plötzky F., Pirklbauer J., Balke W. What a Publication Tells You–Benefits of Narrative Information Access in Digital Libraries. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 2022. DOI: 10.1145/3529372.3530928.
  • 6. Santana B., Campos R., Amorim E., Jorge A., Silvano P., Nunes S. A survey on narrative extraction from textual data. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2023, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 8393–8435. DOI: 10.1007/s10462-022-10338-7.
  • 7. Ranade P., Dey S., Joshi A., Finin T. Computational Understanding of Narratives: A Survey. IEEE Access, 2022, vol. 10, pp. 101575–101594. DOI: 10.1109/access.2022.3205314.
  • 8. Li J., Liu M., Qin B., Liu T. A survey of discourse parsing. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2022. vol. 16, no. 5. DOI: 10.1007/s11704-021-0500-z.
  • 9. Piper A., So R.J., Bamman D. Narrative Theory for Computational Narrative Understanding. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2021. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.26.
  • 10. Algavi L.O., Volkova I.I., Kadyrova S.N., Maslennikova A., Rastorgueva N.E. «Bednaya russkaya mysl'»: poluchim li my avtomatiziro-vannoe izvlechenie narrativa? [«Poor Russian thought»: will we get automated narrative extraction?]. 2019. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33111.52640 (in Russ.).
  • 11. Mani I. Computational Modeling of Narrative. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, 2012, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–142. DOI: 10.2200/s00459ed1v01y201212hlt018.
  • 12. Evstigneeva N.V., Oberemko O.A. Modeli analiza narrative [Narrative analysis models]. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 2007, no. 4, pp. 95–107 (in Russ.).
  • 13. Chen M., Huang T., Chen T., Boonyarat P., Chang Y. Clinical narrative-aware deep neural network for emergency department critical outcome prediction. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2023, vol. 138, p. 104284. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104284.
  • 14. Kumar A.M., Goh J.Y.Q., Tan T.H.H., Siew C.S.Q. Gender Stereotypes in Hollywood Movies and Their Evolution over Time: Insights from Network Analysis. – Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 2022, vol. 6(50). DOI: 10.3390/bdcc6020050.
  • 15. Zeldes A., Muller P., Liu Y.J., Braud C., Iruskieta M., Badene S. The DISRPT 2021 Shared Task on Elementary Discourse Unit Segmentation, Connective Detection, and Relation Classification. Proceedings of the 2nd Shared Task on Discourse Relation Parsing and Treebanking (DISRPT 2021), 2021. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2021.disrpt-1.1.
  • 16. Kim J., Trueblood A.B., Kum H., Shipp E.M. Crash narrative classification: Identifying agricultural crashes using machine learning with curated keywords. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2020, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 74–78. DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1836365.
  • 17. Lee I., Pacheco M.L., Goldwasser D. Modeling Human Mental States with an Entity-based Narrative Graph. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 2021. DOI: 10.18653/v1/ 2021.naaclmain.391.
  • 18. Tang J., Lin H., Liao M., Lu Y., Han X., Sun L., Xie W., Xu J. From Discourse to Narrative: Knowledge Projection for Event Relation Extraction. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 2021, vol. 1. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2021. acllong.60.
  • 19. Meghini C., Bartalesi V., Metilli D. Representing narratives in digital libraries: The narrative ontology. Semantic Web, 2021, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 241–264. DOI: 10.3233/sw200421.
  • 20. Balali A., Asadpour M., Campos R., Jatowt A. Joint event extraction along shortest dependency paths using graph convolutional networks. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2020, vol. 210, p. 106492. DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106492.
  • 21. Quaresma P., Nogueira V.B., Raiyani K., Bayot R. Event Extraction and Representation: A Case Study for the Portuguese Language. Information, 2019, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 205. DOI: 10.3390/info10060205.
  • 22. Zhang N., Deng S., Sun Z., Wang G., Chen X., Zhang W., Chen H. Long-tail Relation Extraction via Knowledge Graph Embeddings and Graph Convolution Networks. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North, 2019. DOI: 10.18653/v1/n19-1306.
  • 23. Yeung C.L., Cheung C.F., Wang W.M., Tsui E. A knowledge extraction and representation system for narrative analysis in the construction industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, vol. 41, no. 13, pp 5710–5722. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.03.044.
  • 24. Chambers N., Jurafsky D. Unsupervised learning of narrative schemas and their participants. Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, 2009, vol. 2 – ACL-IJCNLP '09. DOI: 10.3115/1690219.1690231.
  • 25. Marneffe M., Manning C.D., Nivre J.D. Universal Dependencies. Computational Linguistics, 2021, pp. 1–54. DOI: 10.1162/coli_a_00402.
  • 26. Damonte M., Cohen S.B., Satta G. An Incremental Parser for Abstract Meaning Representation. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017. vol. 1. DOI: 10.18653/v1/e17-1051.
  • 27. Propp V.Y. Morfologija volshebnoj skazki [The morphology of a fairy tale]. Sankt-Peterburg, Piter., 2021, 256 p. (in Russ.).
  • 28. Droog-Hayes M., Wiggins G., Purver M. Automatic Detection of Narrative Structure for High-Level Story Representation. AISB 2019 Convention: Computational Creativity 2019, AISB (Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour), 2018. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327579332_Automatic_Detection_of_Narrative_Structure_for_HighLevel_Story_ Representation, free (accessed: April 04, 2024).
  • 29. Roser S., Moszkowicz J., Knippen B., Gaizauskas R., Setzer A., Pustejovsky J. TimeML Annotation Guidelines. TimeML Annotation Guidelines Version 1, 2006, vol. 2, p. 1. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248737128_TimeML_Annotation_Guidelines_Version_121, free (accessed: April 04, 2024).
Editorial office address

Executive Secretary of the Editor’s Office

 Editor’s Office: 40 Lenina Prospect, Tomsk, 634050, Russia

  Phone / Fax: + 7 (3822) 701-582

  journal@tusur.ru

 

Viktor N. Maslennikov

Executive Secretary of the Editor’s Office

 Editor’s Office: 40 Lenina Prospect, Tomsk, 634050, Russia

  Phone / Fax: + 7 (3822) 51-21-21 / 51-43-02

Subscription for updates